Most Popular Stories
- iHT2 Health IT Summit in Atlanta
April 24-25, 2012 — Atlanta, GA
- Emergency Department Practice Management Association Solutions Summit
May 20-23 — Boston Park Plaza Hotel & Towers, Boston, MA
- GSMA-mHealth Alliance Mobile Health Summit
29 May – 1 June 2012
- Deepak Chopra, MD, FACP at AHIP's Institute
June 20-22 — Salt Lake City
FierceHealthPayer provides the latest news about the fast-changing and heavily regulated area of healthcare reimbursement. Join 16,000 healthcare plan executives who get FierceHealthPayer via twice weekly email. Sign up today!
Aetna ignores regulator to implement 8% rate hike
The California insurance commissioner ruled that aetna Life Insurance's 8 percent premium rate increase was "unreasonable" but was unable to prevent the insurer from implementing the hike April 1.
The rate increase is the latest in a string of hikes aetna has applied, raising premium rates by an average 30.3 percent over two years for 73,000 members in the small group market, reported the Los Angeles Times.
Insurance Commissioner David Jones found the 8 percent rate increase unreasonable because aetna's projections about medical cost increases weren't supported by its actual claims. Plus, he noted that aetna saw a 27.7 percent profit last year, the Associated Press reported.
Despite the first-of-its-kind finding, the authority for which was granted under a state law that became effective last year, Commissioner Dave Jones lacks power to prohibit aetna from implementing its most recent 8 percent rate hike.
Aetna, for its part, isn't backing down from implementing the hike. Jones asked aetna to postpone the April 1 premium increase, but the insurer implemented it nonetheless, according to the Orange County Register. "While rate increases are never easy, our rates are based on actuarially sound data and reasonable projection of future cost," aetna said.
Jones responded that he's "disappointed" that aetna rejected his request to postpone the rate hike. "Like the recent unsustainable rate increases imposed by other health insurers on Californians, aetna's rate increase proves again that we need to close the loophole in California law which denies the insurance commissioner the authority to reject excessive health insurance rates," Jones said.
He added that he supports a proposed ballot initiative, which would let voters decide whether to grant the insurance commissioner the authority to reject rates. Consumer Watchdog, which is backing the initiative, has thus far gathered about 300,000 of the 800,000 signatures required to place the measure on the November ballot, the LA Times noted.
Consumer group pushes for rate reg on ballot
Single-payer bill advances in state legislature
Blue Shield returns $283M more to consumers
California insurers get another year without rate reviews
Home | Subscribe | Advertise | Mobile Edition | RSS | Privacy | Site Map | Editors
THE FIERCEMARKETS NETWORKFierceEnergy | FierceSmartGrid | FierceFinance | FierceFinanceIT | FierceComplianceIT | FierceHealthcare | FierceHealthFinance | FierceHealthIT | Hospital Impact | FierceMobileHealthcare | FierceHealthPayer | FiercePracticeManagement | FierceEMR | FierceCIO | FierceCIO:TechWatch | FierceContentManagement | FierceMobileIT | FierceGovernmentIT | FierceGovernment | FierceHomelandSecurity | FierceBiotech | FierceBiotech Research | FiercePharma | FierceVaccines | FierceBiotechIT | FiercePharma Manufacturing | FierceMedicalDevices | FierceDrugDelivery | FierceCRO | FierceIPTV | FierceOnlineVideo | FierceTelecom | FierceEnterpriseCommunications | FierceBroadbandWireless | FierceDeveloper | FierceMobileContent | FierceWireless | FierceWireless:Europe | FierceCable
© 2012 FierceMarkets. All rights reserved.