'; if(pArray.length >= 4) { i=2; } else if(pArray.length >= 3) { i=2; inline = ''; } else if(pArray.length >= 2) { i=1; inline = ''; } else if(pArray.length === 1) { i=0; inline = ''; } $('#librarydrawer_story_container script').each(function() { $(this).remove(); }); $(pArray[pArray.length - 1]).after(subscribeBox); $(pArray[i]).after(inline).after($('#librarydrawer_story_container')); $('#text-story').focus(function() { if ($(this).val() == 'EMAIL ADDRESS') { $(this).css({color: '#000000', backgroundColor: '#ffffff'}); $(this).val(''); } }); $('#text-story').blur(function() { var trim = $(this).val().replace(/[\s]/g, ''); if(trim === '') { $(this).val('EMAIL ADDRESS'); $(this).css({color: '#666666', backgroundColor: '#f8f8f8', border: '#666666 1px solid'}); } }); $('.content-subscribe .btn-submit').click(function() { var val = $('.content-subscribe .text').val(); if(val.search(/[a-z0-9!#$%&'*+\/=?^_`{|}~-]+(?:\.[a-z0-9!#$%&'*+\/=?^_`{|}~-]+)*@(?:[a-z0-9](?:[a-z0-9-]*[a-z0-9])?\.)+[a-z0-9](?:[a-z0-9-]*[a-z0-9])?/gi) === -1) { $('.content-subscribe .text').css('border', '#ff6600 1px solid'); $('.content-subscribe .text').focus(); return false; } return true; }); }); //-->

State insurance regulators take on narrow-network debate

National Association of Insurance Commissioners drafts new model network adequacy law

State regulation of network adequacy is anything but stable. While some states have guidelines in place to assure consumers see certain providers, others may have specific quantitative measurements.

In an effort to better regulate narrow networks, the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) is working to hash out a new model network adequacy law, reports Managed Care magazine.

When the Affordable Care Act was first implemented, it mandated that health plans sold on the insurance exchanges remain "sufficient in numbers and types of providers, including providers that specialize in mental health and substance abuse services, to assure that all services will be accessible without unreasonable delay," notes the article.  

But now, network adequacy is a hot-button issue. For instance, four states have the highest percentage of narrow-network plans: Georgia, Florida, Oklahoma and California. In these states, at least 75 percent of marketplace plans have narrow networks that cover 25 percent or fewer of all area physicians, according to a recent study from the University of Pennsylvania's Leonard Davis Institute.

To address the growing concerns regarding narrow networks--as well as the relationship between insurers and providers--the NAIC's new standards will focus on a variety of aspects, including: Network adequacy, access to plans, tiering, balanced billing, continuity of care and provider directories, according to the magazine.

The working document says network adequacy would be determined using "reasonable criteria," such as provider-covered person ratios by specialty, geographic accessibility of providers and wait times.

What's more, the NAIC wants to improve rules that would strengthen transparency for consumers and update provider directories. The federal government has similar goals: Earlier this year, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services announced that health insurers must provide up-to-date doctor lists for their Medicare Advantage and Healthcare.gov policies starting next year.

For more:
- here's the article

Related Articles:
CMS tightens provider directory rules for 2016
Number of narrow-network plans varies widely by state
More consumers enrolling in narrow network health insurance plans
Former HHS official calls for smarter narrow networks