Tag:
Latest Headlines
If the U.S. Supreme Court determines in the King v. Burwell case that the federal subsidies are illegal, there are still options available for the 34 states that rely on the federal insurance exchange, former senior officials from the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services write in a new analysis.
If the U.S. Supreme Court rules against the Affordable Care Act later this month in the King v. Burwell case, there still may be hope for insurers to keep their members who need subsidies to afford coverage. That's because it might be easier than initially thought for states to create their own health insurance exchanges and save consumers' subsidies.
If the U.S. Supreme Court determines federal subsidies are illegal when it rules in the King v. Burwell case, it would dramatically increase costs and lower enrollment in the individual market, according to two separate studies.
Now that the U.S. Supreme Court has decided to hear a case challenging the legality of Affordable Care Act subsidies, many states are looking into options that would make them immune to a potential ruling invalidating subsidies.
Press Releases
- Leidos Defense Healthcare Management System Modernization contract
- More than $38 million awarded to improve coordinated health information sharing in communities across America
- Covered California Announces Rate Increases for 2016; Consumers Should Consider "Hidden Premium" From Narrow Networks, High Deductibles, When Shopping For Insurance Says Consumer Watchdog
- Most Wired Hospitals Focus on Security and Patient Engagement
- USW Applauds Supreme Court Decision to Uphold Affordable Care Act Subsidies
- More Press Releases
Sponsored Links