'; if(pArray.length >= 4) { i=2; } else if(pArray.length >= 3) { i=2; inline = ''; } else if(pArray.length >= 2) { i=1; inline = ''; } else if(pArray.length === 1) { i=0; inline = ''; } $('#librarydrawer_story_container script').each(function() { $(this).remove(); }); $(pArray[pArray.length - 1]).after(subscribeBox); $(pArray[i]).after(inline).after($('#librarydrawer_story_container')); $('#text-story').focus(function() { if ($(this).val() == 'EMAIL ADDRESS') { $(this).css({color: '#000000', backgroundColor: '#ffffff'}); $(this).val(''); } }); $('#text-story').blur(function() { var trim = $(this).val().replace(/[\s]/g, ''); if(trim === '') { $(this).val('EMAIL ADDRESS'); $(this).css({color: '#666666', backgroundColor: '#f8f8f8', border: '#666666 1px solid'}); } }); $('.content-subscribe .btn-submit').click(function() { var val = $('.content-subscribe .text').val(); if(val.search(/[a-z0-9!#$%&'*+\/=?^_`{|}~-]+(?:\.[a-z0-9!#$%&'*+\/=?^_`{|}~-]+)*@(?:[a-z0-9](?:[a-z0-9-]*[a-z0-9])?\.)+[a-z0-9](?:[a-z0-9-]*[a-z0-9])?/gi) === -1) { $('.content-subscribe .text').css('border', '#ff6600 1px solid'); $('.content-subscribe .text').focus(); return false; } return true; }); }); //-->

For fraud enforcement, strength in numbers takes on a double meaning


Strength in numbers. It's a tried and true adage that's so universally applicable, it's been used by high-ranking generals as a wartime strategy, or a pack of disgruntled kindergarteners standing up to the schoolyard bully.

For those charged with fighting fraud, it's a maxim that holds true in more ways than one.

Numbers--or more generally, data--have become the building blocks of fraud prevention, detection and enforcement. Both public and private entities are investing in data analytics, technology and software as way to quickly identify and respond to sophisticated fraud schemes. Earlier this month, Richard Statchen, manager of informatics at Aetna, told FiereceHealthPayer: AntiFraud that the key to keeping pace with evolving fraud schemes is ensuring your data is in "good condition," which means making constant adjustments to strengthen those analytics.

But another trend is gaining traction, one that reflects a more traditional "strength in numbers" approach. Collaboration between state, federal and local enforcement entities is becoming a key cog in the wheel, not just at the national level, but within isolated regions and communities throughout the country.

The origins of this approach to fraud prevention can be traced back to 2007, when the federal government rolled out the Medicare Fraud Strike Force in Miami, widely considered the nation's healthcare fraud capital. The new partnership--which consisted of the Department of Justice, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and the Office of Inspector General (OIG)--first made waves when it brought down the owner of a home health company and two pharmacy owners who billed $20 million worth of false prescriptions and durable medical equipment.  

"Our involvement in today's multi-agency anti-fraud effort is a critical part of our continuing resolve to safeguard the integrity of the Medicare program by stopping fraud and abuse," U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta said at the time.

In 2009, the Strike Force was included within the government's Health Care Fraud Prevention and Enforcement Action Team as Strike Force teams eventually expanded to eight other high-risk cities across the country. These efforts have led to more than $10 billion in fraud recoveries since 2008, and the partnerships played a key role in the largest fraud takedown in U.S. history that charged 243 people involved in various schemes.